Introduction
Much has happened in a short space of time
This report outlines the striking results when we surveyed consumers about virtual care in May 2021 and both consumers and clinicians in March 2022.
Back in May 2021, many Australians hoped their lives were about to return to ‘post-pandemic’ normalcy. Instead, a tumultuous period followed. New COVID-19 variants prompted further lockdowns in several locations, as well as extended state and international border closures (and then re-openings). Many employers and workforces continued hybrid working experiments while, at various times and places, parents and teachers steered children through more home schooling (and then school re-openings). And even in the health sector, where COVID-19 presented enormous challenges, there were silver linings too. Chief among them: the increasing appetite among consumers and clinicians to access healthcare virtually.
That growing appetite was evident in March 2022, when we surveyed more than 2,000 consumers to understand how preferences and sentiment towards virtual care had changed since the year before. Our findings are outlined in this report, along with some notable conclusions and considerations for those who lead Australia’s health organisations.
Figure 2: Survey sample key demographics
Consumer survey
Stand-out findings
Our Consumer Survey in March 2022 revealed how consumer attitudes towards virtual care had changed since May 2021. In this section of the report, we highlight four notable trends for health leaders to consider.
More consumers want to access their care virtually
The percentage of consumers who are ‘likely’ or ‘very likely’ to use care virtually (via video consultation, remote monitoring, or asynchronous communication with clinicians) has shown a statistically significant increase of 6 percentage points (up to 50% in March 2022, from 44% in May 2021). This may be driven by consumers’ growing acceptance, capability, and positive experiences of using virtual care.
- Preferences towards virtual care have shifted most markedly among the following consumer segments:
- Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islanders (10 percentage points increase)
- NSW/ACT residents (9 percentage points increase)
- Consumers who are married/de facto/partner with dependents (9 percentage points increase)
- 18-44 year olds (8 percentage points increase)
- Culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations (6 percentage points increase).
More consumers see the benefits of virtual care
As virtual care becomes more mainstream, a growing number of Australians acknowledge the upsides of it. In March 2022, 73% of respondents said they could see the benefits of accessing their care virtually (up 5% since May 2021).
Consumers’ top four perceived benefits of virtual health
Clinicians are keenly aware of the current (and potential) benefits of virtual care. In our survey, many pointed to the ability to:
In March 2022, there was a 10% increase in consumers stating that virtual care will save them time. This benefit will remain highly valued by all Australians, including the many thousands who are making the adjustment to hybrid working arrangements.
More consumers are open to receiving virtual care from medical providers who they have never met before
In May 2021, 30% of respondents were ‘comfortable’ or ‘very comfortable’ having a virtual care consultation with a medical care provider who they had never met before. By March 2022, there was a statistically significant increase, up to 36%.
The consumer segments who displayed the greatest increase in comfort levels were:
This trend may be a signal that consumers are prioritising access to the right care – rather than prioritising the relationship they have with a particular provider. After two years of deferred elective care, consumers may be placing more urgency on timely access to care – rather than waiting for specific providers.
CALD and diverse consumers show a higher preference for virtual care
In both surveys (March 2022 and May 2021), CALD and vulnerable populations demonstrated a higher preference for virtual care options. Notable findings for health leaders include:
- Nearly 63% of CALD respondents prefer to access their health and wellbeing information via email or online resources (compared to 48% of all respondents).
- More than 55% of CALD consumers prefer ‘regularly monitoring and measuring my vital statistics (e.g. blood pressure, weight, blood sugar, etc.) at home and sending the results to my doctor online’ (compared to 43% of all respondents)
- To determine who to see about their health and wellbeing issues, many respondents prefer to research online (e.g. a trusted website, social media, speaking to someone via chat or email). This was particularly the case among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (64%), CALD (62%) and LGBTIQ+ (59%) segments.
Clinicians survey
Stand-out findings
Most virtual care services require patients and clinicians to ‘opt in’ and actively choose to use them. It’s therefore essential that clinicians understand and experience the benefits of virtual care. Unless they do, they won’t recommend virtual care to their patients.
In March 2022, we surveyed clinicians in Australia to understand their views on virtual care. It was clear that clinicians saw many benefits in virtual models of care and are interested in using these. However, clinicians did express some reservations about virtual care and pointed to certain activities that they felt were not well suited to virtual delivery.
Clinicians are interested in virtual care – for certain activities
The clinicians surveyed spent the past 24 months providing care virtually through a range of platforms and models of care which were at varying maturity levels. Looking ahead, clinicians were most interested in using virtual models of care to:
Consult a patient using video conferencing or phone to discuss symptoms and provide advice on further care management
Follow up on a patient’s pathology results via video conference or a phone call
Share information resources with patients on a screen during a video conference (using screen share or a shared digital whiteboard)
Send automated texts to patients via SMS or email at scheduled time intervals, containing information about their health and wellbeing
Send information to a patient about their health and wellbeing via email or through online resources after a medical consultation
Provide patients with information about their specific medical condition in a digital format (e.g. linking patients to a trusted website, sending bundled digital resources via SMS/email).
Clinicians were less interested in using virtual models of care to:
Consult a patient with an interpreter service via video conference or phone to discuss a patient’s medical condition
Perform a medication review via video conference
Demonstrate techniques or exercises to patients during a video conferencing consultation
Direct patients on how to take diagnostic measurements
Receive vital signs (e.g. blood pressure, weight, blood sugar, etc.) measured by the patient at home, and sent at scheduled intervals or in real-time through an online platform
Monitor vital signs at home.
Clinicians and consumers differ when it comes to remote monitoring
The most notable divergence between clinician and consumer preferences is around remote patient monitoring. More than 43% of consumers prefer taking vital signs measured by themselves at home and sending them to a medical provider. However, 34% of clinicians do not prefer this.
In fact, 3 in 10 clinicians believe that one of the barriers to virtual care adoption is the reliability of the data patients supply when measuring their own vital signs remotely. Another concern for clinicians is that the funding structure isn’t well articulated for remote patient monitoring for non-admitted patients in hospital settings.
Clinicians see the benefits of virtual care, but also have reservations
Clinicians are keenly aware of the current (and potential) benefits of virtual care. In our survey, many pointed to the ability to:
However, clinicians also raised some reservations about virtual care. These included perceived risks associated with:
Clinical misdiagnosis due to missing information about a patient (48%)
Difficulties for patients who are not comfortable with using technology to receive healthcare (45%)
The ability of current funding models to subsidise the provision of virtual care services to patients (42%).
Conclusions
How health leaders can move with the turning tide
Our surveys suggest that there is a growing appetite among Australians to access health services via virtual channels. Below, we outline some considerations to assist health leaders and policy makers, as they seek to move services and organisations in alignment and consideration of consumer and clinician preferences.
Design and implement hybrid (virtual and face-to-face) models of care that are consumer-centric and provide excellent user experiences
Health services should continue to focus on building hybrid models of care that seamlessly integrate both virtual and in-person care offerings in a single model of care. To succeed, a hybrid model needs to be grounded in excellent experiences for patients and clinicians.
For health organisations, experience-led design requires a relentless focus on:
easy onboarding
simple navigation of technology
training so that systems can be used effectively, confidently and reliably
accessible, efficient troubleshooting and support
ongoing measurement and monitoring of patient-reported outcome and experience measures.
Consider how virtual care could alleviate workforce and capacity issues
Consumers have growing confidence in receiving care from clinicians that they have never met before. This presents the opportunity for health services to use virtual care models to rebalance the workforce within certain locales — with appropriate specialists in low demand areas providing virtual consultations and support in places of higher demand. This may also help alleviate elective care backlog and waitlists.
Every health leader is keenly aware of the physical and mental toll their frontline workforces have suffered in recent years. Ongoing respite is needed, so supplementing exhausted health workforces with virtual ones can help provide essential recovery time and/or specialist advice, decision support and reassurance.
Boost equity and access to healthcare across geographies and vulnerable populations
Survey respondents from rural/regional, CALD and LGBTIQ+ segments show a notably high interest and uptake of virtual care. This presents an opportunity for health leaders to design inclusive and accessible virtual models of care.
For example, there is anecdotal evidence that many people from CALD backgrounds value the opportunity to interact with clinicians via virtual care while being supported by friends and family members who can navigate language barriers and cultural sensitivities. CALD people’s take-up of virtual care solutions will further increase when more services enable and support interactions with friends and family.
All of which serves to underline the importance of flexibility when designing and developing virtual care solutions. The ability to tailor virtual care to suit different consumer preferences will increase the rate of virtual care adoption and retention. And such flexibility can also enable virtual care services to adapt and remain relevant, as consumer preferences change over time.
To better understand your organisation's virtual health maturity, complete our virtual health maturity diagnostic self-assessment. This tool enables you to evaluate your organisation in nine essential elements of virtual health. Having considered your organisation’s current virtual health maturity – alongside your vision for the future – you can identify steps to elevate and expand your virtual health models.
