In September 2025, the Australian Government released its Net Zero Plan (the NZP). The NZP sets out the Australian Government’s intended pathway to achieve the new 2035 emissions reduction target of 62–70% emissions reduction, relative to 2005 levels. The NZP broadly outlines:
The NZP was accompanied by Department of Treasury scenario analysis to model the likely environmental and financial outcomes under three different transition pathways, referred to as the ‘Baseline Scenario’, the ‘Renewable Exports Scenario’ and the ‘Disorderly Transition Scenario’. These model scenarios illustrate the expected positive GDP impact of proactively responding to the Net Zero challenge under the Baseline Scenario and Renewable Exports Scenario.
In this alert, we summarise the key messages from the Government’s Net Zero Plan and what this may mean for each of the six focus sectors, being Electricity and Energy, Resources, Transport, Industry, Built Environment and Agriculture and Land. We will also summarise the three Treasury modelled climate scenarios and discuss the key outcomes of each.
The NZP outlined the Government’s intended policy actions in response to climate change over the next decade. These actions, as well as the risks presented by adverse climate conditions, present both opportunities and risks to enterprise value. Business leaders should have regard to the Government’s decarbonisation agenda when setting business strategy over the next decade. Failure to consider and if needed, adapt to these regulatory settings may result in missed opportunities for enterprise value creation or preservation.
For tax functions, stronger regulated carbon markets and expanded decarbonisation funding will impact tax modelling, compliance and cashflow management. Relevant considerations may include:
Australia’s Net Zero Plan (NZP) is the Australian Government’s policy pathway to achieve a national emissions reduction of 62–70% below 2005 levels by 2035, with the legislated goal to reach Net Zero by 2050. This pathway must be balanced with supporting economic growth and maintaining energy grid stability. Guided by the five following priorities, the NZP outlines six sector-based decarbonisation plans. The NZP outlines the five priorities to achieve broad economy wide decarbonisation as follows:
Each of these five priorities is applied to each sector decarbonisation plan in varying degrees. The NZP lays out the Government’s intention to reform and streamline regulatory approvals, strengthen mandatory carbon pricing via reforms to the ACCU Scheme and Australian Safeguard Mechanism (SGM) and provide a stable policy platform to finance and mobilise capital in support of decarbonisation and the energy transition.
The NZP highlights that regulated carbon markets, principally the ACCU Scheme and the Safeguard Mechanism, are central to achieving cost-effective abatement and will be continuously reviewed and improved to ensure integrity, effectiveness and broad participation.
For the ACCU Scheme, the Government will strengthen governance and transparency, building on the recent 2023 legislative reforms. The development and approval of additional ACCU methodologies will also be streamlined, with additional landfill abatement, savanna burning and agricultural land management methodologies under development. The new ‘proponent‑led’ method of development is expected to enable businesses, industry groups and researchers to propose new ACCU generation methods, with public registers to enhance visibility and encourage innovation. The Government will also seek to increase the amount of project information published and require up‑front consent from Native Title holders at project registration, to support scheme integrity and social licence.
On the Safeguard Mechanism, the NZP reaffirms to commitment to a comprehensive review in 2026–27. This review will consider the baseline decline rate beyond 2030, coverage arrangements, scope of participation, the potential role of international units, the ability to use SMCs and offsets, the treatment of emissions‑intensive trade‑exposed activities and other matters. Consideration of the above is intended to keep the scheme calibrated to Australia’s new 2035 target and Net Zero by 2050, while sustaining incentives for on‑site abatement.
Relevantly, the current baseline decline rate would likely need to be accelerated to reach the upper range of the 2035 target emission reduction, and as such, the Safeguard Mechanism will continue to be a central pillar in Australia’s response to climate change.
The Department of Treasury released the Modelling and Analysis Report concurrently with the Government’s Net Zero Plan. The report was completed to analyse three different net zero scenarios, and to provide insight into the scale and size of the economic opportunity under the different pathways to Net Zero.
In the Baseline Scenario, Australia builds on existing climate and energy policies to reach an emissions reduction of 65% in 2035 and Net Zero by 2050. This scenario requires a strong and consistent economic and regulatory framework, including:
As a result of the above, there Treasury modelling predicts cost-efficient emissions reduction across the economy, with the Australian economy projected to be 28% larger by 2035 and 81% larger by 2050 relative to current levels. Under this scenario, real GDP per capita is $12,000 higher in 2035 and $36,000 higher in 2050. The Treasury modelling also predicts wholesale electricity prices will fall by around 10%, compared to the 10-year real historical average, by 2050.
In the Renewables Export Scenario, Australia follows the same domestic transition path as the Baseline Scenario but leverages its comparative advantages in renewable energy to capture more global demand for clean energy embedded products. The Treasury modelling indicates Australia achieves this scenario by expanding domestic hydrogen production and supporting the export of low carbon ammonia and green metals.
This scenario generates an additional $85bn in growth for the Australian economy by 2050 compared to the Baseline scenario, resulting in a real GDP per capita rise of $38,000 over the 25 years to 2050. The scenario also results in wholesale electricity prices reducing by an additional 20% in 2050, relative to the Baseline scenario.
The Disorderly Transition Scenario models a weakened and delayed regulatory response to climate change. Under this scenario, Australia retains existing policies but fails to set a credible 2035 target and postpones genuine policy action until the 2040s, resulting in heightened policy uncertainty and reduce business investment.
The Treasury modelling shows a short-term capital misallocation as businesses invest without clear regulatory direction and are forced to rapidly abate emissions in the 2040s. The lower investment in renewable energy also constrains activity in clean energy exports and related industries.
As a result, the Disorderly Transition Scenario is projected to result in average annual GDP growth being 0.1 percentage points lower between 2025 and 2050, leading to a cumulative real GDP reduction of $1.2tn relative to the Baseline Scenario and $2tn relative to the Renewable Exports Scenario. Wholesale electricity prices by 17% (on average) during the 2030s and by up to 54% in the 2040s, relative to the Baseline Scenario.
The Australian Net Zero Plan provides a clear indication of the Albanese Government’s Net Zero policy agenda. To reach the upper limits of the target range of 62–70% emission reduction by 2035, the rate of electrification and decarbonisation will need to accelerate. Australian industries should review the commentary provided in their sector decarbonisation plan and undertake an assessment of what financial and non-financial considerations can be expected.
Business leaders need continued clear and consistent policy direction to inform the requisite long term capital investments.
Craig Fenton
Partner, Energy Transition, PwC Australia
Jonathan Banks
Senior Manager, Tax, PwC Australia
Caroline Mara
Partner, Sustainability Reporting and Assurance Leader, PwC Australia
Paul Cornick
Partner, Global Trade, PwC Australia
Ryan Jones
Australian Energy Tax Leader, PwC Australia
James O'Reilly
Partner, Brisbane Tax Leader & Global Energy, Utilities and Mining Tax Leader, PwC Australia