2. A small boundary shift but more needed of management

Generally, Boards’ relationships with their management teams are strong within the ASX 300.

6% of NEDs say they are experiencing or dealing with unhealthy tension with management in response to governance developments.


Playback of this video is not currently available

Read Transcript...

The majority consider their Chair to be an effective sounding Board to the CEO, providing wise counsel without getting too close. 

Overall, 44% reported that a boundary shift has been necessary as a result of governance developments, albeit only a small proportion indicated that the required shift was significant. Many comments received supported the majority view that the boundary has not changed; however, NEDs are now generally doing more or are expecting more of management.

“The boundary remains the same but what is expected of Boards to satisfy their duties on their side of the boundary has expanded.”

How deep to dig?

The key challenge for NEDs remains the same, impacted by the quality of information and insights received from management.

“There remains the critical question: how does a Board know what is really going on? With all the best will in the world, directors can diligently read the material, interact with the business, customers and stakeholders, ask challenging questions … but if senior management do not know what is going on it is incredibly hard for NEDs to know. This is where experienced, constructive, curious directors with great EQ who can read soft signals, people etc come into their own.”

When asked to select the top three changes to management reporting that would be most helpful, over half chose the need to see improved reporting on non-financial risks (57%) and customer outcomes (55%). Almost as many (47%) selected the desire for shorter Board packs with less information and more insights.

In the financial services sector, 72% of NEDs indicated that changes to the richness in reporting on customer outcomes - including insights from feedback/complaints data and verbatim - would be most helpful to the Board; compared to 48% across other sectors.

Stretching management

Many NEDs reflected on the need to increasingly verify, validate and probe management’s representations and actions (past and proposed), resulting in getting into greater detail than previously required.

Overall NEDS indicated there is room for improvement in management, 37% indicated their company had a high performing management team requiring no material changes to behaviours and practices.

“I think what we need our management to do a bit more of is to step out of the day to day and be willing to be different.”

Close to 40% of NEDs commented that management tended to ‘present’ to the Board rather than engage in a frank conversation, and a third said their executive teams tended to be over-optimistic and not realistic with the Board when addressing complex issues.  

The risks involved in digging too deep

A number of NEDs reflected on the risks involved from the growing expectation of regulators and the community regarding greater involvement of the Board in the management or their companies. 

Contact us

Peter van Dongen

Chairman, PwC Australia

Tel: +61 (2) 8266 3378

Mike Codling

Partner, PwC Australia

Tel: 612 8266 3034

Debra Frances

Senior Executive Advisor, Risk Consulting, PwC Australia

Tel: +61 421 056 456

Emma Grogan

Partner, People and Organisation, PwC Australia

Tel: +61 (2) 8266 2420

Michelle Kam

Partner, Strategy& Australia

Tel: +61 (2) 8266 1299

Follow PwC Australia